Name and Shame UK

We expose the dirty deedsters

21st Century Law - makers and breakers


Current Topics



Top of page

Previous page

Tough on crime; tough on the causes of crime?

How you view this toughness largely depends on how you interpret the word 'crime'.

If you are a pensioner who cannot afford to pay your extortionate council tax from your meagre pension, then you can be certain a cell awaits you. If you try to do the job that you believe the police should actually do, i.e. remonstrate with yobs, then you will find yourself on the wrong end of the law's arm. If you express opinions that are shared by the majority, i.e. your views on immigration, then you can be assured a magistrate somewhere is just dying to demonstrate how much power he has under our new politically-correct regime.

The on-street enforcers of these new laws are what we used to refer to as bobbies - the guys who spent their time rounding up villains and ensuring they did their porridge. Now, under the leadership of chief constables and senior officers with degrees in 'sociology', 'golf course management' and 'dwile flonking', our bobbies are concentrating all their efforts on people who dare to defy the government's ambition to control every intimate portion of our thoughts and lives. They are lurking around every corner waiting to hear words of dissent from genuinely caring people - people who don't like what they see happening to our country; people who think Britain was a far better place without the European Union, immigration, and New Labour.

So if you think murderers should be hanged, if you think life should mean life, if you think yobs should be birched in the town square, if you think illegal immigrants who make their living in the UK from the proceeds of crime should be chucked out with the words 'Deported from the UK' tattooed on their foreheads, then you should know that none of this will happen. The police will be too busy tracking you down to worry about sorting out problems that you, and millions like you, believe are turning Great Britain into Crap Britain.

Whilst you have such thoughts you are at great risk of falling foul of the law. And it will be no use protesting about your Human Rights. You don't have any! Such rights are accorded only to those you consider as scumbags - the ones who used to be known as criminals. In your case, a cell can easily be made available for you by granting early release to a murderer, thief or armed robber.

Tough on crime and the causes of crime? What a joke! All you can do to avoid the 'thought police' is to go along with the government - or Angela Merkel - and follow the party line. Let them dictate what your lifestyle should be and agree with them. If you see a real crime in progress, see nowt, hear nowt, say nowt.


Editorial Anecdote:

I'm half expecting a visit from the Metropolitan Police any time now because yesterday I swore at a vanload of them travelling in the opposite direction to me. The reason for my anger? I was approaching a nearside bend in the road and the police van completely sliced the corner. My only options were to mount the pavement or do an emergency stop. I chose the latter and screeched to a halt. The van missed my car by inches.

The patrol was not on a call (or, if it was, no blue lights were flashing) so as it passed I called the driver a f***ing idiot. No doubt this could land me in big trouble as several officers were looking in my direction and they must have taken the registration number.

But the fact is that I expect better driving standards from police drivers and I expect them to keep to the correct side of the road, especially when they are right outside a school entrance.


Visitors' Comments

Roy Carson, Wirral writes:

Hi Mick C

May I wish you a very happy new year and good reporting. I have read your home page and totally agree with you and what a great web site. Good on you.

I found you on Google search into Percy Hughes and Roberts Solicitors Birkenhead. I think I should write a book on Merseyside Police from the days of the late CC Sir James Sharples in false statements, making false arrests, etc.

Don't trust the police complaints system (PCA) I am sure you know just like the bad solicitors advice (SIB) who themselves are working for the sole protection of their members as I believe from the many cases I have followed in Liverpool, including mine as a long standing Licensee in Liverpool.


JM writes:

I AM A PENSIONER AGED 66 AND I LIVE IN THE TOWN OF COLNE, LANCASHIRE. ON THE 14/4/07 I WAS SUBJECTED TO AN UNPROVOKED ASSAULT BY AN UNLICENSED PUBLIC HOUSE DOORMAN AT THE UNION EXCHANGE PUBLIC HOUSE IN COLNE BUT NO CHARGES WERE EVER BROUGHT AGAINST THE UNLICENSED THUG OR THE LICENSEE WHO EMPLOYED HIM BECAUSE NOT ONLY IS THE LICENSEE A VERY GOOD FRIEND OF THE POLICE OFFICER THAT DEALT WITH THE INCIDENT, THE POLICE OFFICER ALSO SITS ON THE SAME PUB WATCH COMMITTEE AS THE LICENSEE.

THE PC TOLD HIS INSPECTOR A PACK OF LIES ABOUT ME TO PROTECT THE LICENSEE FROM POLICE ACTION BUT DID NOT TELL HIS INSPECTOR THAT THE LICENSEE WAS EMPLOYING UNLICENSED DOORMEN, WHICH IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE ON ITS OWN AND CARRIES A VERY HEFTY PENALTY (SEE SIA WEB SITE). BUT IN LYING TO BLACKEN MY GOOD NAME HE LOST ME THE RIGHT TO JUSTICE . EVEN AFTER I MADE A COMPLAINT TO THE IPCC INSPECTOR PUTTOCK, PC MARK WALKER'S INSPECTOR, LIED TO COVER UP FOR PC WALKER SO YET AGAIN NO ACTION IS TO BE TAKEN. HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO CLEAR MY GOOD NAME FROM ANY WRONGDOING?

I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW HOW MANY CORRUPT POLICEMEN THERE ARE. HOPE THIS CAN BE PUBLISHED ON YOUR WEB SITE.


Editorial Comment:

In certain forces there appear to be plenty of corrupt officers but few are brought to book.


Tony, Barnsley writes:

I need a solicitor who is honest or is anti-Freemasonry, maybe anti-council. Can you help


Editorial Comment:

Sorry, I only know two honest solicitors and neither are anywhere near Barnsley.


John R Jones of Lytham St Annes writes:

BBC News - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/north_west/8590537.stm  - Police sergeant appeals 98mph speed case in Colwyn Bay

A policeman caught driving at 98mph, nearly twice a 50mph limit, should not have been prosecuted, it is claimed. Sgt Craig Nicholas Jones, 40, an organised crime officer, is appealing against a speeding conviction while on duty. A decision is expected next week.

His barrister, Simon Gurney, claimed at Caernarfon Crown Court that it was an "abuse of process". He said North Wales Police had adopted a policy of not enforcing the speed limit because 50mph signs were unlit. Mr Gurney said this should have applied to Sgt Jones, when he was caught on the stretch of the A55 expressway concerned, at Colwyn Bay. The barrister also insisted that, as the signs did not comply with regulations because their lighting had failed, Sgt Jones' conviction should be overturned. Mr Gurney said: "His knowledge of the speed limit isn't a relevant factor."

A district judge fined Sgt Jones, an advanced police driver, 500 and banned him for 90 days at Llandudno last December. The penalties were lifted ahead of the appeal. He had denied speeding late at night last April while taking a prisoner in a police VW Golf to Caernarfon, but was convicted. The crown court judge and two magistrates who head the case are to give their decision next week.

Thought: The 50 mph was a localised speed limit but bear in mind that the national speed limit (60 mph on single carriageways and 70 mph on dual carriageways) is the legal maximum enforceable on any public roads in the UK when there aren't localised limits. Just because the 50 mph lights were not illuminated doesn t mean the national speed limit wasn't enforceable. I can accept he thought it was 70 mph along this stretch of dual carriageway (he probably knew it was 50 mph but took advantage of the lights not on) but doing 98 mph is still in excess of the speed limit for 70 mph.

Question: If this conviction can be overturned, does that mean that if lighting fails to make drivers aware of a 50 mph limit it is legally acceptable for them to drive at 200 mph since the national speed limit doesn't apply either? Why this preference to let him off when he exceeded the national speed limit? He doesn't need illuminated signs to make him aware of the national speed limit - this doesn't vary. It is 60 mph for single carriageways; 70 mph for dual carriageways. If he didn't know this then why is he an organised crime officer?

Double standards eh! We need to expose this hypocrisy and practice of double standards for the Controlling Elite and their agents. These teachers pets - like MPs with their expenses - need to be brought to justice as well as named and shamed.


Norman Scarth of Bradford writes:

'Bad experiences'? A completely law abiding WW2 veteran, from the age of 74 I suffered 11 months of unlawful but very effective house arrest, ending with a brutal kicking by Blair's Gestapo that put me in hospital. Then a malicious prosecution for a NON-EXISTENT 'crime', a Kangaroo Court 'hearing', followed by six years of constant moves between many different prisons & lunatic asylums.

I am NOT a criminal  and I am NOT a lunatic. I could bury you with an avalanche of evidence of corruption, particularly in the courts & the Judicial Mafia. However, I will try not to do that, but will send only a few examples.

Now 84, I am STILL under attack from the murderous gangsters who now run Britain - the country I fought for 67 years ago, brave men (of both sides) dying around me in large numbers. See normanscarth.blogspot.com.

My crimes? In 1997 I stood for Parliament & published the book 'CAUSE FOR CONCERN'. However, my worst 'crime' was that I won a case in the European Court of Human Rights - SINGLE-HANDED! It brought a vital change in British law. The change is much hated by lawyers & judges and I am hated for it!


Eileen Pritchard of Wrexham writes (on 16th April 2012):

For past 15 months a police inspector's daughter and wife have written the most horrific abuse about my family  - mostly about my 5 year old daughter Daisy - www.daisypritchard.co.uk..

North Wales Police refused to help stating repeatedly that it was written via Facebook ad they have no jurisdiction over Facebook. I have recent telephone conversations reiterating that. I am however in court for retaliating after someone made untrue statements against my son and I snapped and called her a 'fat cow' on Facebook! My trial starts 28th May 2012!!!!!

During Jan and Feb 2012 alone I received over 100 abusive messages from the wife of the Police Inspector, many calling me fat. She received a caution on March 17th. The daughter has previously called my husband a paedophile and stated there was pictures showing him abusing our disabled daughter.

So far the police are refusing to even meet with us to discuss our complaint. I have written to MP's but to no avail including the Home Office who have written stating they have no jurisdiction over North Wales Police and advise me to go to the IPCC who keep referring it back to NWP!!!!

Any advice would be much appreciated. I am quickly finding out there is no one other than the IPCC who only refer any complaints back to NWP.


Editorial Comment:

I wish I had the answers to your problems but I don't. MPs are mostly a bunch of useless tossers, the police are mostly a waste of space and a major drain on financial resources, and the IPCC appear to exist primarily to defend the police. A vicious circle occupied by people protecting only their own interests.


Leslie Lewis of Bury Lancashire writes:

I have evidence of the strongest level of gross incompetence and lack of duty correctly undertaken by the Blackpool Police (Lancashire Constabulary). I have had my computers taken four times now on the grounds of illegally downloading child pornography.
I was arrested and taken to court but this last time on February 17th 2010 on my own application when I took the case to Crown Court in Preston I was found NOT GUILTY by an independent jury as there was no evidence or any form of substantiation of the charges brought. This was because of accusations made by a criminal sub-postmaster (the customers service of the post office in Barnsley have had details of all the criminal actions of this sub-postmaster in Blackpool and as a result of police homophobia I have been driven out of Blackpool by the police in the Bonny Street Police Station in Blackpool.
Despite the evidence I had against this sub postmaster, FAYAZ AYUBY, of the post office in North Shore Blackpool the police there, for reasons best known to themselves, have continued to protect this criminal who is also a landlord (I lived as a tenant in one of his flats for over twelve months). This criminal has made false allegations against me (with full police support) and he has stolen by deception 600 and criminally assaulted me in the street on Monday 29th August 2010 - in front of a witness. But still the police refused to do anything about it.
I was however arrested for harassing FAYAZ AYUBY instead. He told many of his customers that I am a paedophile. This was reported to the police also but again they refused to do anything about it. Blackpool police again took my computers, personal papers, records and the evidence I had from my home in Lancashire but they also took my carer's property as well. The issue was with me NOT my carer and his property should never have been taken.
The issue is with FAYAZ AYUBY and the Blackpool police who are dangerous liars.
These matters have been reported to the IPCC who just referred the matter back to the Lancashire Police Authority. This is a farce.
I HAVE FULL EVIDENCE OF THIS LONG TERM POLICE CORRUPTION WHICH I WILL SHARE WITH ANY PERSON IN ANY COURT OF THE LAND. To refer matters such as these back to the police authority complained about, as the IPCC have done, is rather like having complaints about gassing 6,000,000 Jews given to Adolph Hitler and Adolph Eichmann to investigate.



"Many men stumble across the truth ... but most manage to pick themselves up and continue as if nothing had happened."

Winston S Churchill


Google Ad


Google Ads